GitHub repo
assessment agent
Paste any public GitHub URL. Claude investigates the repository and scores it across seven pillars — from documentation to discoverability and growth signals.
Works with any public GitHub repository · View on GitHub
What the agent checks
Documentation quality
README clarity, CHANGELOG maintenance, API docs, and roadmap visibility. The front door of any project.
Community health
Contributor onboarding, issue responsiveness, Code of Conduct, and inclusive experience signals.
Code health
CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, semantic versioning, dependency management, and branch protection.
Security posture
License clarity, vulnerability disclosure process, supply chain integrity, and secret scanning.
Sustainability
Maintainer health, activity signals, bus factor, and funding transparency. Will this project last?
Discoverability NEW
README conversion quality, GitHub Topics, package registry presence, and demo content.
Growth signals NEW
Launch channel evidence, ecosystem network effects, and organic momentum patterns.
Scoring breakdown
130 points across seven pillars. The two new pillars (Discoverability and Growth Signals) close the gap between code quality and actual adoption.
Documentation
Community
Code Health
Security
Sustainability
Discoverability
Growth Signals
Score interpretation
| Score | Verdict | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 110–130 | Excellent | Production-ready, discoverable, enterprise-suitable. Strong across all seven pillars. |
| 85–109 | Good | Solid foundation. Address discovery and community gaps to reach the next tier. |
| 55–84 | Needs work | Critical gaps. Fix documentation, community health, and launch strategy first. |
| 0–54 | High risk | Multiple failures. Not ready for external users or production dependency. |
Ready to assess a repository?
Paste any public GitHub URL above, or explore the complete scoring rubric.
View full standards